It wasn't pointless (SPOILER)
pippin_999
foxmoth at pippin_999.yahoo.invalid
Wed Jun 25 16:47:28 UTC 2003
--- In the_old_crowd at yahoogroups.com, "psychic_serpent"
<psychic_serpent at y...> wrote:
>
> > **
> > **
> > **
> > **
> > **
> > **
> > **
> > **
> > **
I think the real lesson for Harry to learn from all this is not how
to grieve, but how not to be like Sirius, who never got over his
need for revenge, and so that gave him a cursed life ("a half-life,"
as the people are described who would dare drink unicorn's
blood). I also think that Harry needs to make sure he doesn't do
what both Sirius and Voldemort did--set out to prevent
something and by doing so bring those events about.<<
Hmmm....I thought Sirius gave up his desire for revenge when
he let Pettigrew go. I don't think the idea of setting out to prevent
an evil is shown as bad in itself, although, as Dumbledore says,
the consequences of our actions are difficult to predict. The
message seems to be that we should trust our consciences
rather than our fears for the future when we have a choice to
make. I think Sirius did that, or he'd have killed Pettigrew despite
Harry's plea for his life.
IMO, Black's real problem was his ego. All along we've asked
ourselves why he didn't just Owl Dumbledore to warn him about
Pettigrew, and why he felt he had to come back to Hogsmeade
even though there wasn't much he could do there, and at the end
of OOP we have to ask why he couldn't trust the rest of the Order
to go help Harry. IMO, he couldn't delegate because he never
thought anybody was as good as him, except maybe James and
Lupin.
I think the tragic flaw in Sirius was this need to feel superior, and
his doom was sealed when he refused to free Kreacher. Yes,
the Elf might have gone straight to Voldemort...but wasn't that
exactly Fudge's rationale for wanting Sirius in Azkaban? Maybe
Kreacher would have died from the shock, but as Sirius said
himself, some things are worthy dying for. As master, Sirius
made himself just as much a prisoner as Kreacher was. The
ultimate irony is that all Sirius had to do was free Kreacher and
the Order would have been forced to give up the house and let
Sirius leave.
All his life Sirius defined himself by who his inferiors were, by the
people who were beneath him and didn't need to be cared
about: Wormtail and Snape at Hogwarts, Kreacher at Grimmauld
Place, his fellow prisoners in Azkaban, whom he never seems to
have tried to comfort or help. Weren't they as worthy of his
concern as Harry?
I think in GoF we saw Sirius at his best, living as a free
man, but even then there are hints of his flaw. Sirius says this,
"If you want to know what a man's like, take a good look at how
he treats his inferiors, not his equals." Winky's treatment is
questioned, the idea that some people are inferior to others
never is.
Pippin
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive