The Protection of the Prophecy Plot (Was: Themes and theories)
pippin_999
foxmoth at pippin_999.yahoo.invalid
Wed Feb 16 14:38:51 UTC 2005
--- In the_old_crowd at yahoogroups.com, Catherine Coleman
<catorman at y...> wrote:
> far), I was very dissatisfied with the whole prophecy plot line.
Not so much regarding the prophecy itself, but I still cannot
comprehend why exactly it was so important to guard the
prophecy - or even keep it in existence. Yes, there is the whole
insanity thing to get around, but why on earth couldn't they have
just smashed it? Dumbledore, after all, had (allegedly) perfect
recollection of it. I can only think of two reasons - one, that
Voldemort wasted almost a whole year trying to get hold of the
prophecy, and so bought Dumbledore some time, and two, that
he was trying to lure Voldemort into revealing himself at the
Ministry, which he presumably expected only to work if Voldemort
failed to lure Harry there first, hence the importance of
> occlumency.
>
Pippin:
Not only are those the reasons given in the book, they make the
prophecy pure McGuffin (Alfred Hitchcock's term of art for the
object of desire that sets a mystery in motion.) Like Hammet's
classic Maltese Falcon it turned out to be completely worthless
except that everyone wanted it. "Such stuff as dreams are made
on," to quote from the film. Ooooh.
Pippin
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive