Some speculations on the night at GH

[Lyn J. Mangiameli]

--- In the_old_crowd at yahoogroups.com, "nkafkafi" <nkafkafi at y...> wrote:
> Snip of Neri's personal hermeneutics which comes to the conclusion below< 
> As I wrote here before, it is dangerous to base a theory on the
> suspicious absence of events that, in the opinion of the theorist,
> *should* have happened. I'm not saying such clues are worthless, and
> I've used this type myself more than once, but I'd usually try to
> corroborate a theory with additional and more reliable canon.
> 

Ah Neri, our interactions thus far show we are little able to appreciate each others 
arguments and approach to analysis. I have no need to convice or convert you, and shall 
not try.  I offer my little speculations--I really find them too modest and tentative to be 
properly entitled theories--for those who find them enjoyable or thought provoking. I am 
content knowing that my little speculations may be stimulating and/or fun diversions for 
some, and not for others.
Lyn