[the_old_crowd] Re: A BIAS in the Pensieve: A Batty Idea About Snape

Magda Grantwich mgrantwich at mgrantwich.yahoo.invalid
Mon Feb 28 18:15:03 UTC 2005


>>Magda Grantwich <mgrantwich at y...> wrote:
>> 
>> The other issue is: what's the point - plotwise - of Snape being
>> a vampire?  Lupin's werewolfishness is integral to the plot in POA
>> and to his character throughout the book.  What would Snape's
>> vampirishness contribute to our knowledge of him?


>"Lyn J. Mangiameli" <kumayama at ...> wrote:
>
> I think my theory may offer that point (of course you may not
> agree). It explains why the Prank was not made public, and it gives

> a reason why James and Snape could never reach 
> a resolution (James always has something on Snape that Snape did
> not have on James)....

> Regardless, I think it is great that you are skeptical. If we
> jumped en mass on every new 
> speculation, there would be chaos. Still, it might not be so bad to
> take the time to probe 
> and digest some less mainstream ideas. Afterall, few discoveries
> have been made by those in the mainstream.


I believe we'll find that the Prank was not made public because the
person who would have been punished the most by it was the totally
innocent party: Lupin.  I don't see what Snape's non-existent
vampirishness had to do with it.

And thanks for your kind advice in your last paragraph, even though
it seems a little - patronizing.  I did consider the Snape-vampire
theory the first time I heard it (years ago) and rejected it for the
reasons I mentioned in my earlier post.  I have not seen any argument
in favour of the theory that causes me to change my mind.  

Magda


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. 
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250




More information about the the_old_crowd archive