[the_old_crowd] Re: HBP spoiler(ish): Hor-thingies: etymology
Richard
hp at gulplum.yahoo.invalid
Mon Jul 18 02:49:41 UTC 2005
At 00:25 18/07/05 , Amanda Geist wrote:
<snip my exposition>
>No, no, this makes immediate sense to me. Horcrux = hors (outside)
>crux (soul). The outside soul. The part stored out there. As opposed
>to the inside soul, the part you still have.
Yes, but the Horcrux is the container, not the soul itself (or part
thereof). Sluggy himself provides the definition: "A Horcrux is the word
used for an object in which a person has concealed part of their soul." (UK
p. 464).
It therefore doesn't make sense for its name to be based on any kind of
"outside"; "inside": "horreum" (place of storage) seems to fit the bill
perfectly (despite the double R).
My issue remains with JKR's massive leap of anti-etymology in making "crux"
mean soul. OK, the dictionary might offer "central point or feature", but
from there to "soul" is, as I said before, a huge leap. Why not build a
word on the perfectly adaptable Latin/Greek "anima", or even Greek
alternative "psyche"? (the latter would have had readers confusing it with
"psycho" in its modern tabloid sense, which I think would've been fun).
I'm not entirely sure if what pisses me off most is that I couldn't guess
it, that I lost the best part of an hour thinking about it - time which
would've been better spent reading, or that it simply doesn't make sense.
Whichever is true, it certainly is a major irritant with me. And it's a
silly portmanteau word to boot.
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive