[the_old_crowd] Re: HBP: Spoiler: the 4

[JoAnna Wahlund]

To the tune of "The More We Get Together":

I'm not gonna give spoilers

Give spoilers, give spoilers,

I'm not gonna give spoilers

BUT READ THE DARN BOOK!

On 7/17/05, Amanda Geist <editor at ...> wrote:
> 
>  > > s
> > > 
> > > 
> > > p
> > > 
> > > o
> > > 
> > > i
> > > 
> > > l
> > > 
> > > e
> > > 
> > > r
> > > 
> > > s
> > > 
> > > p
> > > 
> > > a
> > > 
> > > c
> > > 
> > > e
> 
> 
> > I didn't know this, but it seems reasonable that if a wand is what 
> we
> > seek, then Olivander is the man to kidnap...
> 
> Definitely. Especially since Ollivander's has been around since what, 
> 392 BC? Ollivander's ancestor probably *made* her wand.
> 
> ~Amanda
> 
> 
> 
IF LV did find Rowena's wand and used it to make a Horcrux, the Horcrux is 
already made *and* hidden - so I doubt LV & co. would kidnap Ollivander to 
*find* Rowena's wand, because it's already been found. I was under the 
impression from the book that all of the Horcruxes have already been made; 
however, it is possible that LV is still making Horcruxes, and is seeking 
Rowena's wand to make another one (perhaps one that he didn't have the 
chance to make before his downfall).

However, I'm willing to guess that Ollivander might have a way of tracking 
all the wands that have ever been sold by his shop - which may include 
Rowena's - hence the reason for his kidnapping. However, if that's the case, 
why hasn't this method been used before - for example, to find LV's wand? 

-- 
~JoAnna~


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]