SPOILERS: First Read Rant
nkafkafi
nkafkafi at nkafkafi.yahoo.invalid
Mon Jul 18 17:22:45 UTC 2005
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
SPOILERS BELOW!
This is my rant-after-the-first-read. Nothing very interesting,
probably, but I need to get this out of my system.
This is the first time I'm really disappointed with an HP book. I'm
not disappointed because Snape turned out the ESE (I never thought he
is a good person, and he still remains a complex character). I'm not
disappointed because there wasn't a "good Slytherin" (I personally
never needed one). I'm not disappointed because of the excessive
shipping (never been allergic to it), I'm not disappointed because
she killed DD (although I kind of hoped she'd avoid this specific
cliché) and not because all my theories were shot down (I was
prepared for that).
No, the reason I'm disappointed with HBP is simply because most of
it, IMHO, is sub-par. It's poorly written, relative to JKR's
standards. Am I the only one who feels that way? I frequently had the
feeling like I was reading FF and not the real thing. To say that
this book was under-edited would be a big compliment. I think the
editors should have told JKR to take her time, do an extensive
rewrite and get back to them in another 6 months, or maybe a year.
Well, I guess publicity finally went to JKR's head, or the editors
didn't dare criticize her, or they were under pressure to finish
quickly.
The plot was simply all over the place. No proper buildup of
suspence, no dramatic flow and rhythm, plot devices felt artificial.
Many important things were spelled out instead of implied by dialogue
and description. Most of the book was emotionally flat. For example
Harry accepting Kreacher that easily simply wasn't realistic. Another
example: Snape finally got his wish to teach DADA, and apart from the
very first, none of the lessons is described at all. You'd expect
damned *fireworks* between Snape and Harry when they finally meet in
DADA, but nothing. HBP has almost no captivating sections like
(counting from OotP alone): the DA meeting, the close ward scene,
Occulomency, Snape's worst memory, the anti-Umbrige rebellion, etc.,
and also no killer location like the DoM.
The mystery plot: I'll have to re-read to make sure, but after my
first reading it seems to me that there are several big holes in the
plot. For example, why didn't Harry suspect even once during the
whole year that the Half-Blood Prince is Snape? I mean, who do we
know that is good at Potions and has a small cramped handwriting?
Cm'on! I suspected Snape from the first second and hoped for a long
time that in the end it would turn out to be someone unexpected. No
such luck.
Shipping: Like I wrote above, I'm not averted to shipping, and I've
predicted all three ships in HBP a long time ago, so I should be
content, right? Wrong. It is possible to write good shipping and bad
shipping, and most of the HBP shipping was very poor. It felt like
typical teen FF. After 5 books Harry finally notices Ginny, and
there's no tension buildup, no colossal rows, no real angst, no
heartache, no dramatic/tragic revelation. Every single summersault of
Harry's insides over Cho in GoF was more realistic and powerful than
that. R/H on the other hand have lots of rows and angst, of exactly
the same type they have in every book only much more of it, and by
the end of the book they still haven't done anything about it. Kind
of starting getting on your nerves. The L/T has done much better,
probably because it featured much less in the story.
The horcuxes: it's a nice plot device, similar to several ideas that
came up here. The problem is: 95% of it is based on completely new
information. It couldn't have been deduced in any way from what we
knew before. So what's the point in having any theories at all? And
the secrets of the remaining horcruxes' identities and places? Can it
be deuced from what we know now? I wouldn't bet money on it.
Baddies: No Voldy except in old memories. Bella and Narcissa having a
family argument in one redundant chapter. Three or four completely
new DEs and a werewolf we know nothing of and don't care much about.
I guess Snape was the compensation, but except for that last AK and
the subsequent chase his performances in HBP are pretty mild.
Movie contamination: At least one clear case - in the books Hermione
had never punched Draco. She'd *slapped* him.
Characters: JKR invents a whole horde of new characters, which
necessarily come on the expense of continuing the development of old
ones. Why was there any need to replace Fudge with Scrimgeur just to
fill approximately the same function? Neville, Moody and the Creevys
brothers were completely neglected. Bill, Luna, Dean, Lavender and
Hagrid are there but merely as plot devices. Percy gets half a scene
that doesn't develop the story in any way. Ginny's exclusion from the
trio just doesn't sound realistic: would a determined girl like that
agree, practically without argument, to be excluded from the secrets
kept by her boyfriend, her brother and her best female friend? Not
bloody likely.
What just barely saved HBP for me are the last chapters: the battle,
the chase and the funeral. They were at least captivating. I also
think I like the new Draco: he's much more complex yet not an
unrealistically "good Slytherin". And we got a new acronym to occupy
us in the next two years. Many ingenious new names and nicknames,
too Phlegm and Won-won really cracked me up. But if JKR thinks it's
enough to invent a few cool names and anybody would worship her
again, well she's wrong about me, at least. She forgot the hard work
part.
Well, I hope this impression will improve in a second read. It did
with OotP.
Neri
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive