[the_old_crowd] HBP Spoilers - Tonks

ewe2 ewetoo at ewe2_au.yahoo.invalid
Tue Jul 19 11:00:00 UTC 2005


On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:19:56AM +0100, Barry Arrowsmith wrote:
> I'LL
>      BE
>          GLAD
>                  WHEN
>                              WE
>                                  DON'T
>                                              NEED
>                                                          TO
>                                                                  DO
>                                                                          
>   THIS
>                                                                          
>           ANYMORE
>                                                                          
>                               WON'T
>                                                                          
>                                           YOU?
> 
> 
> Firstly - commiserations to Richard. One can never have so many  
> friends and acquaintances that one can afford to lose any.
> 
> I'm a bit surprised at the posts members have put up regarding Tonks.
> Where is the steely eyed suspicion, the rampant  paranoia normally to  
> be expected from HP analysers? From what I've read on the board  
> (again forgive me if I've misread or misunderstood what's been said,  
> but these past few days have been a bit frantic to say the least,  
> much more than HBP and The Open to contend with) fans seem to be  
> pussy-footing around somewhat.

Yahoomort seems to be holding my latest post but I concur. My suspicion is
Polyjuice!Lupin but if not, it's Polyjuice!Someone for sure. The FAQ poll
answer rules the real Tonks out. What about Polyjuice!Sevvy? He keeps saying
he's a great actor, and I need more proof the Patronus is a werewolf. But
perhaps another Order member we do not know too well? Emmeline Vance or Amelia
Bones, if you subscribe to the 'fake murders' theory? Hestia Jones? We don't
really know Eliphas Doge or Kingsley Shacklebolt, although the latter is
probably too busy keeping the PM sweet. Or someone else entirely.

> I'm might be wrong, but I'm not uncertain - the 'Tonks' of HBP bears  
> looking at very closely indeed.

Evidence is circumstantial, we need a Theory!

-- 
"I reject your reality and substitute my own!" - Adam Savage





More information about the the_old_crowd archive