Dumbledore's Unspeakable Word (getting somewhat less OT, maybe?)
joywitch_m_curmudgeon
joym999 at joywitch_m_curmudgeon.yahoo.invalid
Fri Jun 10 07:18:16 UTC 2005
--- In the_old_crowd at yahoogroups.com, "davewitley"
<dfrankiswork at n...> wrote:
> David, who can't imagine why Joywitch would fear teasing
I fear nothing!
Getting back to the Goat's question: I don't really understand,
either, why Dumbledore doesn't just say the word "love," but his
failure to do so always reminds me of one of my other favorite
children's fantasy books: "A Wrinkle in Time." One of the witches
tells Meg, as she is sent off to rescue Charles Wallace from
It, "You have something that It does not have." ("It" is a garden
variety evil entity who has imprisioned her brother, Charles
Wallace.) Meg struggles, during the course of a chapter-long walk
to whereever it was that It lives, to understand what she, a mere
girl, could possibly have that the powerful It does not have, and at
the last moment realizes that what she has is love, especially her
love for Charles Wallace, which is what rescues him. In that book
(which I would bet my beloved new cobalt blue Kitchenaid stand mixer
JKR has read), the fact that the word love is never mentioned until
the very end makes the plot much more powerful and far less
sentimental than it would have been if Meg had been perusing her
capacity for love the entire while.
If you think of the scene at the MoM where Voldie has possessed
Harry -- Harry is in pain, Voldie is crying out to Dumbledore to
kill him, and Harry is thinking, yes, Dumbledore, kill us now and
let this pain end. Then, as he thinks about how he'll see Sirius
again when he dies, his mind is filled with love for Sirius and
Voldie is no longer able to possess him. Love is the only thing
that seems to be more powerful than either Voldie or It.
I guess what I'm arguing pretty much the same thing that Mike
speculated -- that Dumbledore doesn't actually use the word love
because use of the word somehow cheapens it by making it into
sentimental smush, but that in doing so she is making a literary
allusion to A Wrinkle In Time (or just stealing a plot device,
depending on how you look at it).
--JZC
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive