checking out the library book / Love - massively OT, mostly

[Barry Arrowsmith]

--- In the_old_crowd at yahoogroups.com, "pippin_999" <foxmoth at q...> wrote:
> 
> 
> Pippin:
> You missed my point, perhaps, or maybe I'm missing yours.
> 
> Are you saying  the existence of  Christian institutions, 
> well attested in the books, as well as in the history 
> of medieval England, does not imply a religion or a  belief in God, 
> but the existence of  Jewish religious institutions
> does? I'm confused.
> 

Kneasy:
No, I don't think you're confused. I think you're making every effort
to refute the thrust of my arguments, to wring out the slightest 
concession - even to seeking agreement against a point that was never
in contention - that might allow you some satisfaction in support of your
views, 'cos unfortunately the history texts aren't providing the expected
comfort to and validation of your own tenets.
Thus - obfuscation and 'misunderstandings' seem the best tactic,
the old 'if you can't convince 'em, confuse  'em' ploy. It doesn't impress.
 
Try reading my posts again. 
Even better - read the book.