Re: The Prophecy From Voldemorts POV (long)
fhmaneely
fmaneely at fhmaneely.yahoo.invalid
Tue May 10 01:08:06 UTC 2005
--- In the_old_crowd at yahoogroups.com, "nkafkafi" <nkafkafi at y...>
wrote:
> > > David:
> > > I missed all that on HPFGU. I think, however, there is
undoubtedly
> > > a valid debate to be had here.
> > >
> > > At the end of POA, JKR made it part of the ethics of the story
that
> > > killing is not a valid way to achieve an end. By Harry's own
> > words,
> > > he would make himself a murderer by killing Voldemort.
> > Dumbledore's
> > > reluctance to share the prophecy with Harry is based, as I
> > > understand it, on the idea that both *apparent* alternatives -
kill
> > > or be killed - are equally awful.
> > >
> > > The task JKR has set herself, then, is to come up with a way of
> > > permanently neutralising Voldemort, consistent with the
prophecy,
> > > that does not leave Harry morally compromised. Harry's use of
> > > Cruciatus in the MOM suggests she will push this one to the
wire.
>
>
> > Fran: the prophecy states "power to defeat" not power to kill.
IMO
> > Harry will defeat LV but not kill him. I defeated an someone in
a
> > tennis match but I didn't kill him.
>
> Neri:
> But the prophecy also says "and either must die by the hand of the
> other". This is a bit more difficult to wriggle out of, but still
> possible.
>
> One way can be if "the hand" is a person, Peter for example. I had
> this theory, which might be termed The Shylock Effect: after the
> graveyard, Voldy sharing blood with Harry makes them vulnerable to
> each other (don't ask me why, but DD's famous gleam hints as much).
> However, Voldy shares blood also with Peter, because a severed hand
> contains more than several drops of blood. Voldy is thus also
> vulnerable to Peter, although he doesn't realize it. After Harry
will
> vanquish Voldy in the more metaphorical sense, Peter can finish the
> dirty work, while (naturally) saving Harry's life and paying his
debt.
> This can be made to work nicely in several levels.
>
> And yes, I know it's too LOTR, but I can't help it, and it seems JKR
> can't either. She might deny it, but DD's speech in the end of PoA
> about why it was OK to spare Wormtail is too similar to Gandalf's
> speech about why Bilbo did the right thing when sparing Gollum.
>
> Neri
I was not thinking about the dying at the hand of the other part
obviously. I can't help thinking that LV will not die but will be
conquered. DD said there were fates worse than death. Sometimes I
wonder is about 2 different things. Way out there I know....
Fran
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive