Notions of potions
Barry Arrowsmith
arrowsmithbt at kneasy.yahoo.invalid
Thu Sep 1 11:50:24 UTC 2005
"As there is little foolish wand-waving here, many of you will hardly
believe this is magic."
True.
Looks more like cookery to me.
A pound of this, a spoonful of that, a pinch of the other, stir well,
and regulo 5 for 30 minutes. Voila! Transform your best friend into
a gibbering idiot.
And just like cookery, one might try various combinations of
ingredients and techniques before deciding which is best. Which
creates a bit of a problem for those enamoured of Lily being the or
co-author of the super-duper recipes in the HBP Potions book.
Throughout the series the students get to make each potion once and
once only - or at least there's no indication that lessons/practicals
are repeated. And like good little scholars they attempt to reproduce
whatever instructions are scrawled on the blackboard. Naturally
enough, they want decent marks, and there is at least the assurance
that what they are presented with actually works if they follow the
directions to the letter.
Who is going to have the time or opportunity to fiddle around in an
attempt to improve on the standard recipe? Or the inclination, come
to that. Unless you see your career path as potions, potions, all the
way, why bother?
Now it's possible (the serendipitous version of Sod's Law) for
someone to make a glorious mistake, to accidentally improve on
Potions formulations by sheer chance. Bound to happen sooner or
later - an infinite number of students stirring an infinite number of
cauldrons - yep; I can see that. Except that the improver couldn't
be certain that the 'mistakes' they'd made were the reason for the
superior product. Wouldn't they assume that the result was achieved
despite their unorthodoxy, not because of it? Probably yes - unless
they repeated their actions a few times and kept getting the same
superior results. How much more unlikely is a string of such
improvements? In a school Potions class? Um. You think so? Excuse me
while I admire the porcine aviators looping loops above my keyboard.
No. I don't think so.
Those recipes were the result of many and varied attempts, someone
ringing the changes, altering this, trying that, before finally
succeeding. A potions wonk, a cauldron nerd, an unguent anorak. Or
just possibly someone who was checking things out, searching for
something very different and these enhancements were unintended by-
products, but useful nonetheless.
Logically it's very unlikely that the 'all new improved' recipes were
arrived at by messing around in a Potions class. Same goes for the
spells. How does one invent a new spell anyway? Is there a standard
protocol - think up a bit of cod latin, wave a stick and hope like
hell that whatever happens it can be reversed? Mm. Worth thinking
about. I know what happens in RW research and those not involved in
science would be surprised at how boring it can get - the same
procedure is repeated time and again, the results checked and then do
it again with just one factor or step altered, and so on ad
infinitum, or so it can seem. Then publish so that everybody else
gets to have a go - and if they can't get it to work you've got
some explaining to do. It's doubtful that Jo has bothered over-much
about such mundane details, though Gilbert Wimple works in
Experimental Charms, so maybe she has.
One can imagine a bunch of spell-checkers beavering away somewhere
deep in the Ministry, encased in protective dragon-hide, nervously
taking turns at being on the receiving end of the latest break-
through in transfiguration technology. Brings a whole new dimension
to the phrase 'being a guinea pig'. Same goes for potions - who do
they try them on? Could end up with Giblets of Fire if they're not
careful. Hmm. Could be a ficcy-type post or two in spilling the beans
on what the back-room boys are up to. Radio TBAY, perhaps? Yes... one
or two horrible puns have formed already.
Back to my druthers, the potions book.
It was published 'about fifty years' ago. Not a chance observation
IMO, though that may just be my paranoia - Grindelwald, Tom, the
Diary, and now a potions book; can you blame me for being suspicious?
Though as others have pointed out just because the book is 50 years
old it doesn't mean the hand-written entries are. True. Equally, it
doesn't prove they aren't. Tom was an orphan - so who paid for his
robes, his cauldron, his wand - and his textbooks? A bursary?
Charity? Or were his books loaned to him by the school and handed
back when he finished his courses - complete with marginal notes?
Perhaps Sevvy also qualified for a helping hand from Hogwarts and had
the use of the same book? Pure speculation, but who would be more
likely to experiment - a brilliant student like Tom or a grinder like
Snape?
Alternatively the notes could be the result of a Potions Master
researching his subject - and here there are two possibilities -
Snape or Slughorn. One stumbling block is if a teacher improved on
potions recipes you'd expect him to demonstrate the improvements in
his classes, and that applies even if Student!Snape was the one with
the remarkable insights, he'd incorporate them into his classes when
he became Potions Prof. Could even publish them - become the new
standard text - if Lockhart can do it, why not Sevvy? Only one reason
I can think of - they weren't his spells, and claiming them as his
own might cause their true begetter to get a little annoyed with him.
Yes, he did tell Harry it was his book and his spells, but IMO it's
not advisable to regard everything that Harry is told as gospel. And
there's someone else around who for some reason or another has been
largely ignored in the discussion of the potions book - Slughorn. He
was teaching potions fifty years ago, taught Tom and later Snapey and
Lily - and he's the one that gives the book to Harry. A collector of
celebrities, a flatterer who'd like to incorporate young Potter into
his little club. Would turning Harry into a potions superstar also
turn his head and help Sluggy in his aim of luring Harry into his
circle? Depends how much you trust Horace. Not very far, would be my
response.
It'd be nice to be sure, wouldn't it?
Kneasy
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive