Spoiling the fun
quigonginger
quigonginger at quigonginger.yahoo.invalid
Sat Sep 17 13:12:03 UTC 2005
Great thoughts, Kneasy. As you can see, I've snipped the whole darn
thing, but since I am posting immediately after, I'm sure your
thoughts will be fresh in everyone's mind. Now that I've said that,
I'm sure someone will beat me to the "send" button.
No matter. I just wanted to throw in a few thoughts of my own.
I love the interviews when they stick to those odd little factoids
that will probably never make it to the books. Middle names,
favourite colours, personal history that will have no impact on the
events of book 7; mention those, and I salivate.
Why? Because it increases the Potterverse without diminishing the
fandom aspect of it. Not that I want to know all of it. AniMinnie's
love life with the tomcats of Hogsmead can stay her personal
business. Same goes for Hagrid's conception. Engorgement charm?
Pah! The man would have needed a blood replentishing potion just to
get through the foreplay. No, I don't need to know.
On the other hand, she can spill the theoretical beans from here to
Tuesday, and I'll eat it up. How does animagic transformation work
if one is pregnant? If one is a hamster, and gets knocked up in that
form, does one as a human give birth to a litter? Of what? And what
is the gestational period? How does the transformation effect the
baby (babies)? Do your human kids never have to be reminded to eat
their veggies? Do they have an affinity for Ferris wheels? Do they
have to gnaw on the woodwork in order to avoid dental problems? I
want to know! "Yes, teacher, Kevin is lacking ambition, but it's
really not his fault. His father was a sloth. Really."
Along those lines, does MM understand the cat language as a human?
Could Sirius have attacked LV and co. with an army of pit bulls under
his command?
Tell me the history of House Elves! So long as it's not a major plot
point, that is.
When it comes to theories, however, I agree with you, Kneasy.
Imagine the fun that would have been missed had JKR revealed the
identity of the 4th man right after GoF. (Side note to Eileen:
Please give Elkins my fondest greetings when next you speak, will
you? Thanks.)
Conversely, REDHEAD ALWAYS would have gotten quite the boost had we
known then that Ron's eyes were Dumbledore blue.
Sure, I had RAB figured by the end of the chapter, but Rowena Amy
Benson was such a fun mental exercise. I do hate to see her chop the
stray tendrils of the mind before they can bud, but there are always
other questions.
What is the other horcrux? What did Dudders hear when he was
demented? Did MM know Tommy when they were at Hogwarts? I, for one,
found Tommy's history to be most satisfying in HBP. What about
DD's? We can still speculate on those and leave the Dean Thomas
histories to the website as interesting filler.
Someone on TOL, (Potioncat?) brought up that there are Potter fans
who have not read the interviews. Imagine! <shakes head> I have
spoken to a few who have never theorized. Why, my own cousin, who
got me into the series, didn't notice anything amiss with the
original wand order, and I know she can read.
I do think JKR is directing her interviews and web comments to our
lot. Were she not allergic to cats, I'd wager she would love playing
with the ball on a string. The trick is to pull it away as the cat
is pouncing, without interrupting the leap; and on occasion, to let
the cat grab the ball and run with it just to see what it will do.
Such is the trick with spoilers. I love the tidbits, but I'd rather
she kept the crucial info for us to find in the finished text.
Ginger, in full ramble mode.
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive