Heaping vow upon vow/Viewing the evidence
carolynwhite2
carolynwhite2 at carolynwhite2.yahoo.invalid
Tue Jan 24 22:25:29 UTC 2006
> Carolyn:
>
> Was that the first unbreakable vow that Snape had made? Could it be
> that the reason that DD had complete faith in the man was, quite
> simply, because Snape had sworn an unbreakable vow to
support/protect the Order/Harry..?
Neri:
There's no need for another UV just for that. A Life Debt to James
would work just as well, and doesn't require any further assumptions.
The canon is already supplied. For more details see
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/145024
Now, if you also want Snape to be indebted to Dumbledore, that too
could be arranged, but would require a few speculations regarding how
Life Debts work. Nothing really out there, though. The details are in
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/140493
Neri
Carolyn:
Hm, missed these posts - don't visit TOL much these days. Glad that
Faith seems to be getting pretty desperate: surely she must get her
stilettoes stuck in one of the many worm-ridden decks at some point?
I should desist your Health & Safety inspections - you never know
your luck, she'd might break her neck or at least fall into the
bilges where she belongs. But nevertheless concerned that you appear
to have succumbed to a bout of SHIPping fever .. trust you are fully
recovered from the madness?
My obvious response is that an unbreakable vow could have been the
mechanism that DD used to transfer Snape's life debt from James to
Harry, if the LD is really that important. I quite liked Del's theory
that life debt's were about keeping people alive, and you were only
in trouble if your debtee died due to your carelessness. I can
imagine Snape's horror and exasperation when he found that giving
Voldy the information about the prophecy accidentally put his own
life in great danger. Certainly prefer it to LOLLIPOPS or variants
thereof.
It's a possibility, but meanwhile our man from the Welsh borders is
having another run at the 'facts', and although no doubt it'll all
end in another round of possession theory, there's no doubt that he's
on to something: what happened in the pub muddies the waters as to
when Snape changed sides.
Kneasy:
There is a small discrepancy between the two testimonies. Sybill says
she saw Snape when he 'interrupted' her interview i.e. she was out of
her trance.
DD insists that Snape only heard half the prophesy (which may also
conflict with his previous assertion "was detected a short way into
the prophecy and thrown from the building").
Was it by chance that the job interview was held in a pub?
Just how much did Snape hear? Does it matter?
Anne:
We have to remember that Dumbledore's and Trelawney's accounts may
both be true -- if we allow that DD failed to tell Harry the *whole*
truth in OoP i.e., presumably leaving out a part about Aberforth
showing Snape to DD before throwing him out.
In any case, maybe we should at least add that DD paled visibly when
Harry informed him that Trelawney had named Snape as the evesdropper.
Carolyn:
If you re-read Ch 25, the whole explanation gets dodgier and dodgier
IMO. Why on earth did DD go to the pub to talk to Trelawny, and not
just the pub but up to her bedroom? And how come Snape knew where DD
was? It seems clear that the silly old bat had no real idea what
happened:
'Yes, there was a commotion outside the door and it flew open, and
there was that rather uncouth barman standing with Snape, who was
waffling about having come the wrong way up the stairs, although I'm
afraid that I myself rather thought he had been apprehended
eavesdropping on my interview with Dumbledore - you see, he himself
was seeking a job at the time, and no doubt hoped to pick up tips!'
If we take anything away from what she says, it seems that Snape may
already have applied for a job at Hogwarts and may have been rumbled
by DD. Perhaps DD allowed himself to be followed to the Hogs Head,
and arranged for Snape to be caught by Aberforth. DD certainly may
not have known Sybill would come out with a 'real' prophecy, but
subsequently saw advantage in encouraging Snape to repeat the bit
that he'd heard to Voldy.
Alternatively, Snape heard most of it, already had reasons to turn
from Voldy, and agreed willingly to spy for DD. Certainly DD must
have had a subsequent interview with Snape if Aberforth definitely
captured him outside the door.
Carolyn
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive