The Political HP
Jim Ferer
jferer at jferer.yahoo.invalid
Tue Jul 31 06:06:27 UTC 2007
Barry, Asley, and Caius:
http://tinyurl.com/yomtk6 Univ. of Tennessee Prof. Benjamin Barton
also gives a libertarian interpretation of HP
http://www.lashawnbarber.com/ffc/wp-content/SSRN-id830765.pdf
This essay was written after HBP, and is fairly lengthy - a brief
article about is available here:
http://dailybeacon.utk.edu/showarticle.php?articleid=51562 -
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Lyn: "I leave all of the above to preserve the links. Barton details
the evidence over the first six books (and the last book provides
additional examples) of the malignancy inherent in the MOM,
essentially irrespective of its leader. So is it any wonder I find
fault with her casual epilogue comments (Today Show interview) that
the future careers of all three of the trio is in extended MOM
service. Saccharine is actually too kind a term to apply to what she
now presents."
JKR doesn't seem to trust large, intrusive government, so I think she
is taking something of a libertarian tack here. Libertarians believe
governments will inevitably get into self-perpetuating mischief if
they grow at all large or get involved in too many things. Defense,
though, is one of the government functions libertarians admit, so
careers as Aurors are still valid in this view. I was always struck at
how the MoM never seems to have to answer to anyone. The Minister is
chosen by who? We never learn, except that he's not elected. I
thought of all the technocrats in Brussels when I thought of the
Ministry bureaucracy.
Jim Ferer
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive