Transfiguration here we come
Barry Arrowsmith
arrowsmithbt at kneasy.yahoo.invalid
Sun Mar 18 16:19:12 UTC 2007
--- In the_old_crowd at yahoogroups.com, "davewitley" <dfrankiswork at ...> wrote:
>
> Hmm...
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_6460000/newsid_6464000/646404
> 9.stm
>
> 'A spokesperson for Warner Bros., who make the films, told
> Newsround: "We're extremely confident that Emma will be back for
> films six and seven."'
>
> Sounds like the usual pre-contractual shenanigans. No doubt somebody
> at WB reasoned that, as she only gets the sidekick and not the lead,
> her pay could be reduced accordingly, and her agent told her to throw
> her toys out of the pram to the Sun or whoever.
>
> David
>
Presented slightly differently in the press:
"TEEN film star Emma Watson is about to do a vanishing act
from Hogwarts because the Harry Potter films have lost
their magic.
The pretty 16-year-old, who plays key character Hermione
Granger, wants a spell doing other roles.
She has REFUSED to sign a new contract, plunging the final
two movies of the JK Rowling novels into crisis.
The feisty young actress has told producers that even doubling
her pay packet to £2 million a movie won't do the trick.
Filming on the sixth film in the series Harry Potter and the
Half-Blood Prince is due to start in months.
Daniel Radcliffe is already signed up to star as the quidditch-
playing wizard and Rupert Grint will again play Harry's best pal
Ron Weasley.
He told us: "Emma doesn't want to do it any more. She's tired of
being known as `that girl from Harry Potter'."
She was shocked when a besotted fan stalked her at school.
Rupert added: "Daniel and I are distant from her now. We don't
text or talk to her when we are not filming."
Their last film together Harry Potter and the Order of the
Phoenix comes out in July.
Film makers Warner Brothers confirmed Emma, has not signed
for more movies."
Mind you, the 'press' in this case is a Murdoch scandal-sheet that
out-sells every other Sunday and is usually referred to as 'The News
of the Screws' A touch on the sensationalist side with censorious
overtones, you know the sort of thing I mean, though they've
learned to be accurate when quoting directly, it costs 'em a bomb
otherwise.
Um. A thought.
Didn't Warner sign up for the first 5 books?
When did they contract for the last two? Don't remember reading
anything about it. Though the films don't interest me much so I
probably missed it (haven't seen the last one and don't intend to, not
after that godawful PoA thing.)
Kneasy
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive