[HP4GU-FAQ] Yahoo...& legal sensitivity

[Tandy, Heidi]

Just as an aside, this is one moment when I would *love* to know exactly
what Nancy Stouffer's legal people said/.wrote to Jenna, who does that great
HP site, to see how close we'll be going to her "touchypoints" with what
we're doing. Does anyone know?

-----Original Message-----
From: Penny & Bryce Linsenmayer [mailto:linsenma at hic.net]


Again, I'll defer to Heidi.  But, I'm not sure zoom.com is any more public
or any more troublesome than Yahoo in that regard.  People can lurk & read
our messages without joining the Club (I *think*).  I hope I'm not speaking
out of turn on that point -- I'm fairly certain we have open archives so
that people can evaluate whether to join or not (but I could be totally
making that up).  But, I'm not sure there's any real cause for concern on
those grounds. Plus, I don't honestly think anyone has said anything truly
libelous -- nasty (yes), analytical about her claims (yes) & judgmental
(yes).  But, libel . . . .well, Heidi can answer better than I. 



NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message
contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are
not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard
copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return
e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note
that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a
prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any
attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster,
& Russell, P.A.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://archive.hpfgu.org/pipermail/hp4gu-faq/attachments/20000822/f8c44365/attachment.html>