MEMB prefix was Re: General Policy Stuff

pippin_999 foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Oct 11 18:39:12 UTC 2003


Cindy said:

> I think this is a fine idea.  It doesn't, unfortunately, help us in
> deciding what to do about *past* posts.  So we're back to 
square one on those, I'm thinking.  
> 

I came up with the same idea as Tom and sent it to MEG before 
reading his post here. Great minds, eh?

I suggested we leave the prefixed posts in the list archive and 
adopt an honor system. No snooping, no leaking. That way, 
those who didn't take part in a discussion could avoid those 
posts, while those who did would still have access.

Old messages  that would qualify for  the prefix  could be 
scrubbed, archived  elsewhere and consulted on a need to know 
basis.  

The following is from Groups Messages Help under Moderator 
Questions:

"You can delete messages that are off topic, offensive, or 
otherwise objectionable."

So it seems that scrubbing is okay, though I'd still like to hear 
from Heidi.


Thoughts?

Pippin
delurking






More information about the HP4GU-FAQ archive