MEMB prefix was Re: General Policy Stuff
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Oct 11 18:39:12 UTC 2003
Cindy said:
> I think this is a fine idea. It doesn't, unfortunately, help us in
> deciding what to do about *past* posts. So we're back to
square one on those, I'm thinking.
>
I came up with the same idea as Tom and sent it to MEG before
reading his post here. Great minds, eh?
I suggested we leave the prefixed posts in the list archive and
adopt an honor system. No snooping, no leaking. That way,
those who didn't take part in a discussion could avoid those
posts, while those who did would still have access.
Old messages that would qualify for the prefix could be
scrubbed, archived elsewhere and consulted on a need to know
basis.
The following is from Groups Messages Help under Moderator
Questions:
"You can delete messages that are off topic, offensive, or
otherwise objectionable."
So it seems that scrubbing is okay, though I'd still like to hear
from Heidi.
Thoughts?
Pippin
delurking
More information about the HP4GU-FAQ
archive