Proposed changes to reject categories - pl. comment

[boyd_smythe]

> Carolyn wrote:
> Harry has 364 posts
> Snape has 277 posts
> DD has 186 posts
> Sirius has 122 posts
> 
> It would be more helpful to users of the catalogue to break them up 
> into sub-categories. Is it too early to start thinking about this, 
or 
> should it be done on second review?

It's not that bad, really, because many of these have checked the 
character and another box or two that, taken together, identify the 
real subject of discussion. For example, one post might have two 
checks: Snape and the Dark Mark. As long as we can search the finished 
product by multiple categories, any user who wants to look up posts on 
Snape's Dark Mark will find that one.

This does call into question whether we have all of the appropriate 
subcategories listed *somewhere*, though.

> Erm, well other people can select FP FILKs if they like, but refuse 
> point blank to even review them myself. Didn't we decide that Caius' 
> site did the job for us? 

Not much of a FILKer myself. (Of course, now that I've said it the 
demon of irony has probably plotted a course for me through 
neverending FILKs in my next allocation.) But if Caius does these 
well, and most make no new canon points, then why isn't FILK a reject 
category?

--boyd