Proposed changes to reject categories - pl. comment

[corinthum]

Carolyn wrote:

> > It would be more helpful to users of the catalogue to break them up 
> > into sub-categories. Is it too early to start thinking about this, 
> or 
> > should it be done on second review?

And Boyd replied:

> It's not that bad, really, because many of these have checked the 
> character and another box or two that, taken together, identify the 
> real subject of discussion. 


I agree with Boyd on this one.  I very rarely categorize posts into
just one category, so the general topic of the post can be determined
by the combination of categories used.  Adding subcategories would be
redundant, since all the subcategory ideas that I can think of are
easily summarized with combos (person-person-SHIP, Neville-memory
charms, Slytherin-good vs. evil, to name a few topics I've recently
been working with).

So, obviously, since I'm writing this, I'm back stateside.  Hello to
everyone who joined the group while I was gone.  Moment of truth...
Paul, I'm ready to try combining my database with the real one
whenever you are.

Also, Carolyn, I can start working again, so I'll need a new set of
posts.  

-Kelly