Weasley Age Gaps

[carolynwhite2]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "potioncat" 
<willsonkmom at m...> wrote:
> 
> I'm working on the Weasley age gaps which sometimes includes the 
> possible Missing Weasley and/or the Ron is a 7th son Weasley. Most 
of 
> these seem to fit better in the Group Dynamics/Weasley family than 
in 
> the "how old is______?" catagory. In some cases that would mean 
> adding the code for dynamics.
> 
> Thoughts, anyone? Kathy K., what do you think?
> 
> I'm leaning toward the age gap heading to be about the ages of the 
> characters rather than possible scenarios of what might have been.
> 
> More thoughts?

Carolyn:
Erm, isn't this what I said a few days ago:

>>In my view, 1.2.12 (calculating character's ages) should maybe be a
subset of 1.2.10, characterisation, whereas 1.2.12.1 (Weasley age
gaps) should maybe be a subset of 1.2.11.1 (Weasleys), except that
would make it a level 5 head. Maybe all of 1.2.12.1 should just be
folded into 1.2.11.1 and left for KathyK to sort out <g>...<<


> 
> So far I've marked over half to be removed from the heading or 
> rejected completely. But I think I'll glance through the ones being 
> kept to further weed out the duplicated ideas.
> 
> Along that line, did we already decide that I don't need every 
> Weasley name to be coded along with the age gap code? Some posts 
are 
> only about Bill and Charlie, some include everyone in the house. 
> Right now, most are only the age gap. A few have more to say about 
a 
> character and in that case the character is coded.
> 

Carolyn:
I wouldn't code all the Weasleys individually on these posts.


PS - all my Yah groups were ducking in and out of sight all day, no 
idea what the problem has been. 

Could make a pope joke, but suppose I better not.