Weasley Age Gaps

[potioncat]

 Kathy W before:
>   I've marked ones for elimination. Some that are worth keeping might 
fit just as well in the dynamics. So, should I cull the list (1.2.12.1) 
and let Kathy K consider how the keepers fit with the Weasley code of 
1.2.11.1?

Kathy W now

I took action on the Weasley Age Gap posts 1.2.12.1:
Was 109 now 36. Some of these are only coded to the one heading, some 
have other codes as well. Many of these are already coded to Weasleys.

In that number I completely rejected  a little over 20 posts.

Why don't we leave it be until I sort out 1.12.1 Calculating 
Characters' Ages? That way, whatever we do with ages will be consistent.
Because many of the Gap posts were also coded to Characters Ages, the 
numbers for that have dropped too. 1.2.12 was 204 now 185.

There are probably enough Weasly Age Gap posts now. If you come across 
any while coding, only code if it is about calculating the age gap and 
is a very good post. Any that have to do with whether Arthur was 
working too hard and wasn't in the mood or Molly's possible post-partum 
depression and not in the mood, or the war with LV and no one was in 
the mood...well, make your best judgement call.

Kathy W.