[HPFGU-Catalogue] Next set, fanfic discussion, and a missing theory

[Kathy Willson]

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: corinthum<mailto:kakearney at comcast.net> 
  To: HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com<mailto:HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com> 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 5:33 PM
  Subject: [HPFGU-Catalogue] Next set, fanfic discussion, and a missing theory



   
  Kelly wrote:
  In this past set, there was a thread discussing the merits of 
  fanfiction, and whether it was a valid interpretation of the books 
  and consistent with authorial intent or not.  I rejected it all as 
  Fanfic-related, but on second thought, perhaps that rejection 
  category is for discussion of specific fanfic rather than the topic 
  of fanfic?  Could those posts be valid discussion (authorial intent, 
  reader response, etc)?  Let me know what everyone thinks, and I'll go 
  back and re-categorize those if necessary. 


  Kathy W 
  I had the same thought with a similar post. In that case, I decided the post wasn't worth keeping. Wouldn't it be similar to movie-related?  If it had a canon related basis, it would be coded accordingly and if it were only about fan-fiction it would be rejected?

  Would it ever be possible to find posts based on the rejected headings?




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPFGU-Catalogue/>
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com<mailto:HPFGU-Catalogue-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://archive.hpfgu.org/pipermail/hpfgu-catalogue/attachments/20050203/b8025c03/attachment.html>