BREAKING IT DOWN

[potioncat]

Wow, in looking at the database, some of you are ripping right 
through the posts! I'm about one fourth through.

Quite a few of McGonagall posts have the code 1.4.3--1.4.6, portrayal 
of males/females/gays. Some of these don't really pertain to her and 
she could be un-coded even if the posts continues. Others would be 
worthy of both codes. But I think this could be like the Weasley 
family dynamics...what are the readers going to be looking for?

A few posts have only been "I predict MM will become headmistress.Or 
if not her, Snape..."  I would be willing to reject all or at least 
most of these. They are really just personal opinion pieces. 

The other questionable "co-site" is origen of names. Have we 
determined how we'll handle that one? I wouldn't want to read through 
those if I was interested in MM, but I wouldn't want to read a lot of 
name posts to find out about M&M as names.

Carolyn, are you going to be able to write all these decisions from 
all these posts into one paper when it starts to gell? (Please, 
please, I hope so.)