ESE and 1.2.3.1 Re: McGonagall done

[potioncat]

Carolyn wrote:
> 
Yes, change from 1.2.4.1 to ESE!McGonagall. This will make a lot more 
sense. Probably the ESE! code on its own will go in the end, apart 
from the one code that coined it in the beginning (was there one ?).


Kathy W.
In looking at the ESE code 1.2.4.1, I saw there are 100 posts.(Fudge 
and Bagman were the two who jumped out at me.) I think if each of 
those characters had their own ESE code, 1.2.4.1 would go away and it 
would be a better use of ESE for those looking for a particular 
character. Some characters who are here may not even need an ESE code 
at all. 

It would work OK if we all just uncoded 1.2.4.1 as we went along and 
if we asked for an ESE code for our character if needed. Then when 
all was said and done, there would be just be a few left for someone 
to sweep up. 
Kathy W.