Wands/Priori Incantatem/GH

carolynwhite2 carolynwhite2 at aol.com
Sun Feb 27 15:33:13 UTC 2005


--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "dungrollin" 
<spotthedungbeetle at h...> wrote:
> 
> 
> However, there's also a lot of discussion about the order that 
James 
> and Lily come out of Voldy's wand in the priori incantatem. Should 
> it all be dumped into 3.8.4.4 Priori Incantatem (with apologies to 
> whoever is doing that category)? The posts are generally also coded 
> to 1.3.5.1 Godric's Hollow/Death of Lily & James, though it's not 
> really discussion of what happened, more arguing about the evidence 
> from PI. 
> 
> I'm certain that PI order shouldn't be under 'wands' - but where 
> should it go? Since the error was changed by JKR, do we need to 
keep 
> it at all? Can I dump it all into 3.8.4.4 PI (where I assume 
> there's a lot more discussion that hasn't been coded to wands too) 
> so the ones to axe can be decided by someone with a clearer picture 
> of what's already included in the catalogue? Or, is that category 
> already being worked on, so I can have some new rules as to what 
> should go in and what should stay out?
> 
> Advice please.

Carolyn:
I think dump it into PI for the time being if it doesn't seem 
relevant to wands and how they work. KathyK has signed up for that 
section, but I don't think she is working on it right at this minute.

The decision she then needs to make is what aspects of PI to retain 
in that section, and what should be rightly under the PI chapter code 
in GOF.

Jen, who is doing all the book chapters, then finally gets to sort 
out what should be kept under that chapter code. Hm, pass the parcel 
or what..

Unless anyone thinks that the PI section should really be a subset of 
wands??

Carolyn







More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue archive