Opinion..Big Bang Destroyer...
Jen Reese
stevejjen at earthlink.net
Fri Jan 28 23:57:43 UTC 2005
--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "carolynwhite2"
<carolynwhite2 at a...> wrote:
>
> Do you think that TBAYs taking place on the Big Bang Destroyer
should
> always be coded to 1.3.3.5 Bangs & ambushes ? Even if the theory
> being discussed is not necessarily very bangy?
>
> How should one determine degree of banginess??
>
> Carolyn
> ..beginning to lose her grip
You're not the only one. My coding rate is about 20/hour at the
moment and each post must be averaging 8-10 categories. People wrote
some *long* suckers in the good ol' days. Those posts are
stimulating a few neurons though, there might be a couple of areas
still open for the odd theory or two...
So, I'm finally finished with 38201-38300 and you already assigned
me 38801-38900 in your post #1035. It will probably be next week on
those.
Some old TBay'ers will probably know best about Bangy, but I think
it should only be used for a particular kind of theory and not the
Big Bang Destroyer in general. Cindy could make anything sound bangy
though, eh?
Jen, too tired for TBAY tonight and sending a belated 'thanks' to
Kelly for copying the MD posts to the files.
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive