Opinion..Big Bang Destroyer...

Jen Reese stevejjen at earthlink.net
Fri Jan 28 23:57:43 UTC 2005


--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "carolynwhite2" 
<carolynwhite2 at a...> wrote:
> 
> Do you think that TBAYs taking place on the Big Bang Destroyer 
should 
> always be coded to 1.3.3.5 Bangs & ambushes ? Even if the theory 
> being discussed is not necessarily very bangy?
> 
> How should one determine degree of banginess??
> 
> Carolyn
> ..beginning to lose her grip


You're not the only one. My coding rate is about 20/hour at the 
moment and each post must be averaging 8-10 categories. People wrote 
some *long* suckers in the good ol' days. Those posts are 
stimulating a few neurons though, there might be a couple of areas 
still open for the odd theory or two...

So, I'm finally finished with 38201-38300 and you already assigned 
me 38801-38900 in your post #1035. It will probably be next week on 
those.

Some old TBay'ers will probably know best about Bangy, but I think 
it should only be used for a particular kind of theory and not the 
Big Bang Destroyer in general. Cindy could make anything sound bangy 
though, eh? 

Jen, too tired for TBAY tonight and sending a belated 'thanks' to 
Kelly for copying the MD posts to the files.







More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue archive