Opinion..Big Bang Destroyer...

[annemehr]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "Jen Reese" <stevejjen at e...>
wrote:
> 
> --- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "carolynwhite2" 
> <carolynwhite2 at a...> wrote:
> > 
> > Do you think that TBAYs taking place on the Big Bang Destroyer 
> should 
> > always be coded to 1.3.3.5 Bangs & ambushes ? Even if the theory 
> > being discussed is not necessarily very bangy?
> > 
> > How should one determine degree of banginess??
> > 
> > Carolyn
> > ..beginning to lose her grip
> 
> 
> You're not the only one. My coding rate is about 20/hour at the 
> moment and each post must be averaging 8-10 categories. People wrote 
> some *long* suckers in the good ol' days. Those posts are 
> stimulating a few neurons though, there might be a couple of areas 
> still open for the odd theory or two...
> 
> So, I'm finally finished with 38201-38300 and you already assigned 
> me 38801-38900 in your post #1035. It will probably be next week on 
> those.
> 
> Some old TBay'ers will probably know best about Bangy, but I think 
> it should only be used for a particular kind of theory and not the 
> Big Bang Destroyer in general. Cindy could make anything sound bangy 
> though, eh? 
> 
> Jen, too tired for TBAY tonight and sending a belated 'thanks' to 
> Kelly for copying the MD posts to the files.

My eyes are glazed, not from anything interesting to drink, but from
this virus, and my mind's in a similar state, so that I'm almost
afraid to start coding again.  Thought I'd ease into it by reading the
group, but you're not helping!

Anyway, I'd guess a TBAY scene merely located on the Destroyer without
really being about Big Bangs, can be regarded as being located in TBAY
in general.  Meaning I'd probably not use 1.3.3.5 for location only,
but for subject matter.  After all, there are thousands of posts where
George the bartender appears which are not remotely about the theory
called "George."

*takes deep breath*

All right, I'm going in.

Anne