...quidditch

[corinthum]

Carolyn:

> A question of my own. I am coming across quite a few posts like 
> Debbie's FP on the theme of 'Quidditch is a metaphor for the series'. 
> I have dithered where to put them, and have currently stuck them 
> under 'house Quidditch teams' rather than the history of the game and 
> QWC.
> 
> I think we need an extra Quidditch category, or rename the history 
> one. I was also wondering about moving the Hogwarts Quidditch teams 
> to the Quidditch section -?? Maybe not..

A quick glance makes me think that 3.6.1 History, players, balls, & 
rules definitely needs to be reviewed.  It seems to be a hodgepodge of 
all three Quidditich codes right now.  Did it perhaps become a dumping 
ground for the posts that were previously in 3.6 (before it was made 
uncodable)?  

A Quidditch-general code or similar would probably be a good idea, to 
replace that former heading.  I really don't think the post you 
mentioned belongs in House Quidditch teams, since I just moved 
everything not specifically associated with Hogwarts out of that 
category.  Generalized Quidditch comments I usually dumped in 3.6.1 
(hey, it's already such a mess I figured no one would notice :) ), but 
there weren't many of those.

I think moving the 3.16.4.2 House Quidditch Teams up to 3.6 Quidditch 
is a good idea, if only to make sure coders take notice of the three 
different codes and choose appropriately.

-Kelly