The Gilderoy Lockhart Report (*flourish*)

[annemehr]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "severelysigune"
<severelysigune at y...> wrote:
> 
> Ooookay... Here is the report everybody has been waiting for: that on 
> Category 2.3.5, Gilderoy Lockhart.

> Among the more than 100 posts I propose to reject are:
> 
> 
> -	Etymology of name 
> (which I would say doesn't belong under 'characterisation')

Anne:
This brings up a question relating to how the search functions are
going to work in the end product.  I've been coding etymology of name
to the character mentioned with the idea that people would want to
search the database for "Etymology of name + Gilderoy Lockhart" (or
whoever).  On the other hand, that would be unnecessary if people can
just go to the etymology category and then search there for the
character they're interested in.  Is that how it's going to work?


> -	(Very) idle speculations of all kinds, on SHIPs; on what GL 
> might be good at in the WW; on marital status; on what house he might 
> have been in
> (no canon + generally flimsy)

Anne:
I do think we should keep a very few off-the-wall posts in the
catalogue, just because they are part of the flavor of HPfGU, but only
ones that are truly amusing.  Either that, or make the "just for a
laugh" category available.

~Anne