Quirrell Report
severelysigune
severelysigune at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Mar 17 22:28:16 UTC 2005
This was more or less straightforward. Of the 164 posts I found in
category 2.3.6. "Professor Quirrell", I propose to reject 88.
The main body of those are posts dealing with the question, 'Is
Snape's cover blown after his hunt for Quirrell in PS?'. When they
actually said something about Quirrell himself or his motivations, I
kept them, naturally; but the majority really only just make mention
of him and add nothing to an analysis of his character.
(The nice thing about this was that, despite having voluntarily
deprived myself of coding Snape, I got to read quite a lot of Snape
posts anyway... <g>)
The second group of rejected posts are repetitive ones. They address
1) the question of why Quirrell could not take the PS from the Mirror
of Erised, seeing he was not planning to use it himself - he was
going to give it to Voldy;
and
2) the turban business (when did he actually begin to wear the thing)
and the confusion over the start of Voldy's possession business that
was caused by the Medium That Must Not Be Named.
A few stray posts that deal with spells Quirrell performs (e.g.
wandless magic) have also been rejected when they added nothing about
dear Q's character.
Just something I wondered about: shouldn't the Quirrell category have
its own SUCCESS code? I know it's been filed under Snape so far - but
since it's Quirrell who does the drugging, I personally feel the
acronym belongs to him, not Snape. However, that's really a minor
point - I can just cross-code to Snape's SUCCESS, of course (or
rather, that's how these posts *have been* coded, rightly so).
Finally, a general question for the moment I start coding again (that
won't be tomorrow - I have to carry out this Quirrell-pruning and
then I still have a few Slytherins waiting for me): if you check an
acronym, are you supposed to cross-code to the theory's main
character it involves, too? I mean, if you encounter, say, GEORGE,
it's quite obvious that the post should be about Snape, so does
Snape's category need separate checking?
Eva/Sigune
~who is glad to say she liked Quirrelling FAR better than
Lockharting :-).
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive