Quirrell Report

[carolynwhite2]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "severelysigune" 
<severelysigune at y...> wrote:
> 
> Just something I wondered about: shouldn't the Quirrell category 
have 
> its own SUCCESS code? I know it's been filed under Snape so far - 
but 
> since it's Quirrell who does the drugging, I personally feel the 
> acronym belongs to him, not Snape. However, that's really a minor 
> point - I can just cross-code to Snape's SUCCESS, of course (or 
> rather, that's how these posts *have been* coded, rightly so).

Carolyn:
Can you cross-code for now? When Talisman gets to this one, we can 
decide whether SUCCESS goes under Quirrel or Snape. It can only go 
under one character or another.


> 
> Finally, a general question for the moment I start coding again 
(that 
> won't be tomorrow - I have to carry out this Quirrell-pruning and 
> then I still have a few Slytherins waiting for me): if you check an 
> acronym, are you supposed to cross-code to the theory's main 
> character it involves, too? I mean, if you encounter, say, GEORGE, 
> it's quite obvious that the post should be about Snape, so does 
> Snape's category need separate checking?
> 

Carolyn:
After discussion with Paul, in principle, no. Ie, no need to check 
the main character code as well as an acronym.

*However*, on the new minimilist coding policy, only check George 
and/or Snape if they really are the main subject of the post, rather 
than mentioned in passing.