One more time Re: Timeline report

[potioncat]

> Carolyn:
> I would remove the timelines code from the first two that you 
mention  here, as they already have adequate other codes elsewhere. I 
don't know why people would look here first to think about timelines 
> relating to those events.
> 
> What kind of subject is covered by the posts that would be left if 
> you did that?

KW: I made the changes. (There are two posts left there also coded to 
dating the books.) I'd like to leave Timelines available for those 
posts that come up that don't have an event to be coded to. We may 
ultimately do away with it, but right now it is handy to have.
> 
> KathyW:
> Significant Dates 1.2.9.1.1 was 29 now 11
> This one has a change of definition. > 
> Carolyn:
> Ok, but be sure to amend the definition in the new DB.

KW: done
> 
> KathyW:
> Comparing WW to Muggle 1.2.9.3 was 33 now 0>
> Carolyn:
> Where did the rest get put? I was interpreting this code as 
> difficulties in making JKR's and RL timelines agree. Are these now 
in section 1.2.9.4?

KW: Yes. But I don't want to do away with it until I really look at 
1.2.9.4. If we keep it, I'd like to change it to Comparing WW to Real 
World

Ginger, it's your fault! All day I've been trying to turn Jim 
Croce's "Time in a Bottle" into a filk by Snape. So far all I've 
gotten is:
If I could make time in a bottle, the first thing that I'd like to 
brew...