Neville and memory charms

[Debbie]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "corinthum" <kakearney at ...> 
wrote:
>
> I'm about to start reviewing 3.8.4.1 Memory Charms, and I wanted to 
do
> a little planning in advance.  Do you think MemoryCharmed!Neville
> should be a category to itself, under 2.5.4 Neville Longbottom, or
> should I keep those in this category?  A quick scan shows that 99% of
> the posts here discuss Neville.

My vote is to keep all speculation about whether Neville was Memory 
Charmed under 2.5.4.  It would be nice to have a subcategory, but we 
could probably live without one for now.

> Also, Debbie, did you toss out a lot of Neville-related posts as Adds
> Nothing New?  Plenty of the posts here don't have the Neville code,
> and I'm hoping that's because you kicked them out, and I can do the
> same.  :)

At 345 posts, 2.5.4 is already chock full of Memory Charms of every 
description.  I say toss them out of 3.8.4.1 unless they talk about 
the operation or effects of the charm itself.

Debbie
leaving for Las Vegas momentarily
Leaving Las Vegas tomorrow
10 hours flight time for a 2 hour meeting :-(