Neville and memory charms

[corinthum]

Me:

> Do you think MemoryCharmed!Neville
> > should be a category to itself, under 2.5.4 Neville Longbottom, or
> > should I keep those in this category?  A quick scan shows that 99% of
> > the posts here discuss Neville.
>

Debbie:

> My vote is to keep all speculation about whether Neville was Memory 
> Charmed under 2.5.4.  It would be nice to have a subcategory, but we 
> could probably live without one for now.
...
> At 345 posts, 2.5.4 is already chock full of Memory Charms of every 
> description.  I say toss them out of 3.8.4.1 unless they talk about 
> the operation or effects of the charm itself.

I was really hoping you'd say that.  I agree, I think all the
subcategories here should be reserved for discussion of the
spell/potion/incantation itself rather than related characterization
and plot development.

I think I'll just take this shredder and get to work...

-Kelly