ADMIN: We'd Like to Pick Your Brains About TBAY
Richard
hp at gulplum.yahoo.invalid
Wed Dec 3 02:50:54 UTC 2003
I've spent a huge proportion of the last three days working on a
message with my ideas and replies to the original "questionnaire"
which started this list, and it's growing all the time. I suspect it
might never be posted...
I'll take a break from that by commenting on this particular issue
(which saves me from including these comments in my mega-post
anyway...).
I must make a disclaimer, in that despite having been a HPFGU member
for almost two years, I've been a very sporadic follower of the main
list since mid-June. Apart from the ballooning of the number of
posts, I was away for two sets of two months and simply haven't had
the time, although I occasionally browse for new topics.
As such, my views aren't really on what's happening on the list
*now*, and more particularly on what's happening in *TBAY* now.
To be perfectly honest, I perceive TBAY as something of a mess. I
joined HPFGU shortly after TBAY started and I simply couldn't
understand (and continue not to understand) why some people would go
to the time and trouble of writing ten or twenty paragraphs to put
across a point that could have been (more?) successfully dealt with
in three. I appreciate that TBAY authors derive a great deal of
pleasure from writing in that style, but it simply doesn't appeal to
me, neither as observer nor as potential participant. I recall once
describing it as too "twee" for my taste, a comment which generated a
few raised eyebrows (in good humour). I stand by that comment.
Occasionally, if I have time, I have been known to browse through
TBAY posts. In the past, I've even replied to a few (in "standard"
format). The scary thing is that I've read enough TBAY posts to
understand what's going on and to understand all (well, maybe not
*all*, but most of) the metaphors, and even to recognise some of the
voices.
However, one thing I noticed even before I stopped reading the main
list in June is that many people attempt the format and end up
saying, well, nothing. I don't mean to offend anyone, but I'd
describe some TBAY posts I've seen as little more than verbal
diarrhoea. And many more come very, very close.
As I said, I know that TBAY authors enjoy the format and I have no
intention or desire to limit their enjoyment. Nevertheless, I hope
that TBAYers continue to accept that the format doesn't appeal to
everyone, and some of us prefer the staightforward cut and thrust of
debate-counterdebate rather than the incessant (sorry) "waffle" which
may or may not hide a point worth debating. And that sometimes an
idea put forward in a TBAY post will be responded to in the "standard"
format.
I would also like to remind people that regardless of the format of
messages, the main list remains canon-based and AFAIK, TBAY posts
have not been exempt from this requirment.
More information about the HPFGU-Feedback
archive