TBAY, Filks, combining posts, HBfile
ameliagoldfeesh
ameliagoldfeesh at ameliagoldfeesh.yahoo.invalid
Thu Dec 4 15:15:46 UTC 2003
--- In HPFGU-Feedback at yahoogroups.com, "Shaun Hately"
<drednort at a...> wrote:
> My view is that if TBAY needs the list to survive, as you believe,
and the list
> doesn't need TBAY to survive, then TBAY is being specially
privileged by being
> on the list. If TBAY can't stand on its own two feet, why is the
entire list expected
> to 'subsidise' it?
>
<SNIP>
A Goldfeesh:
This whole debate over TBAY reminds me of when I joined this list a
couple of years ago. Shortly after I joined an immense SHIPping war
broke out. I remember getting a few digests in which 23 out of 25
posts concerned SHIPping, of which I was not interested in the
least. Then came the inevitable call, by others who felt like I did,
to move all SHIPping offlist and that it contained too much fluff,
not enough canon and anyway, *who the heck gave a flying fig if Ron
ended up with Hermione or ran off with the Giant Squid in the first
place*. Penny (msg #31619), the listmum at the time, and John
Walton (msg #31641)both had some good advice as mods. I'm just
trying to point out things haven't really changed much, even though
the list is so much bigger now. If a person dislikes TBAY just skip
over it or delete it. The same goes for FILKS. Neither take up
that much list volume that I can see. Also, if a TBAY post is
lacking canon nothing prevents another listmember from calling the
poster on it. Just quote a bit of the post and ask if they'd care
to provide more canon to it or point out where it is. I wish I'd
done this a couple of weeks ago when I saw a TBAY with very very
minimal canon and *tons* of fluff. TBAY or not, if a person is
posting with little canon-ask them for it. Perhaps the person
doesn't realize what is necessary or needs reminded.
The thing I see that takes up a ton of list volume is that hardly
anyone anymore (other than Catlady) combines posts. Instead of one
nice (though perhaps long) post, I see posters having 3 or 4 short
posts in row on different subjects. Why can these not be combined?
This brings me to the (Not So)Humongous BigFile. Tom Wall, in an
earlier post, pointed out that it didn't have much information about
canon in it any longer. Nor does it have the examples of citing
like I believe it once did- I wish I would have kept an older copy
of it. Plus, I noticed it was lacking (in section two) the bit
about combining posts that it used to have. This, I believe, should
be reinstated.
I would also like to suggest that (instead of redoing all the HB
again) the older version would be posted again for those who would
like to look through it and get more specific tips. It contained
useful information that should not have just been trashed. The older
version could be more like guidelines, than the actual rules,
perhaps. After all, if a person is on this list, they can
apparently read huge tomes and a vast amount of posts, but not a
long file on list rules and ettiqutte? It doesn't seem too much to
ask, really.
A Goldfeesh (who also wishes more people would remember to sign
their posts, having seen that even some of the older members
neglecting it too)
More information about the HPFGU-Feedback
archive