About TBAY : what is expected from a listee ?
Doriane
delwynmarch at delwynmarch.yahoo.invalid
Fri Dec 5 15:55:37 UTC 2003
Hello everybody, the weather's nice today, isn't it ?
Well, I have read all those TBAY-war-related messages (up to message
176), while all the time trying to figure out my own feelings on the
matter. So here goes.
When I came back to this list, earlier this year, it took me quite a
while to start to understand what ever was going on with TBAY. And
even longer to start getting a grasp on it. And still I often find
myself going "???" when I read a TBAY post. So do I like TBAY posts ?
I'd say rarely, and it depends. It depends on many things.
The most obvious one is the quality of the individual posts : how
well do they read ? But that goes for any post.
Another one is their pertinence : was it really necessary to use the
TBAY format, which, as many have pointed, contains a lot of fluff ?
When I see a TBAY post where the format doesn't bring anything to the
matter, I am a bit annoyed. Unless it is *very* well written :-)
And another one is their accessibility : how easy are they to
understand when you're not a fanatic TBAYer ? And that one is a
biggie. I'm not sure TBAY fans realize how much background and how
specific a mindset are necessary to understand some TBAY posts. You
have to know the theories, you have to know their personas, you have
to know what happened before (some theorists are nice and give enough
background info for any novice to understand, but some don't, which
creates a *very* uncomfortable feeling of being left out) and finally
you have to figure out the metaphors and other symbolic stuff (which
I don't).
And I'm not even talking about *writing* a TBAY post...
The same goes for FILKs, by the way. It's a different format, which
requires specific knowledge and likings. But the problem is not as
acute with FILKs, since as far as I know that format is very rarely
used for debating.
So my question is : what is expected of a basic listee ? When I got
on the list, 3 years ago, I had the feeling that the requirements
were quite simple:
- One had to read and speak English well enough to communicate
feelings and opinions with others.
- One had to know what "canon-related discussions" meant. Well,
actually, this one didn't even exist in my time, but it was kind of
obvious to most members.
- And one had to have enough self-restraint not to insult the fellow
list-members, and be polite in every circumstances.
And if one respected all 3 conditions, one could expect to enjoy
*fully* the discussions on the list.
But it seems to me like those conditions have hardened since. Among
others, the following conditions have come up :
- One has to read the *whole* material offered to them, *and* disgest
it ! That material includes but is not restricted to : the HBFile
(that one is logical), the Fantastic Posts, the Hypothetic Alley and
ALL the archives !!
- As a consequence : one had better be on top of every theory that
ever came up out there, and know everything that's already been said
about anything.
(As a consequence of those two, we get A LOT of people beginning
their post with "I don't know if that topic has already been
discussed, I searched the Archives but couldn't find anything, so
anyway I'm sorry if this has been discussed before and if it has can
someone please point me to the right messages, thank you". That gets
boring after a while, and it gives me the horrible feeling that this
list is anything but welcoming...)
- And a third condition is : one has to familiarize oneself with
unusual formats like TBAY and FILK, unless one prefers to miss out on
some discussions. And if one just can't "get it", one will have to
skip those threads.
And *that one* feels *particularly* unwelcoming to me...
So I repeat my question : what is expected of a listee ? To put it
more simply : what is expected of *me* ? Is it not enough that I have
some knowledge of English (which is not my mother language), that I
know my books pretty well, and that I try to remain courteous (my
apologies to anyone I might have offended in the past) ? Apparently
not, since it's not enough to allow me to participate in ALL threads.
In other words, there are threads on this list that require not only
tremendous specific knowledge, but also additional capacities or
specific mindsets, just to participate in and enjoy. There's a word
for that, it's discrimination.
Unless of course the basic standards have changed. Have they ?
If they have, then this should be mentioned, and members should be
warned that if they do not meet those new requitements they won't be
able to understand everything that's going on. Hard but fair. And it
would probably reduce the membership of this list quite drastically
for sure.
If they haven't, then discriminatory behaviours shouldn't be allowed
to take hold. And people who request that other people have a
specific mindset to understand them and who don't care about being
understandable by everyone should be reminded what this list is
about. If they want to have their own fun, they can go and create
their own list somewhere else.
Note : this is not just a matter of *knowledge*, but most of all a
matter of capacity and mindset. Discrimination by knowledge is
impossible to avoid. When someone gets talking about alchemy, for
example, they get me lost. But I don't hold it against them, because
the only difference between them and me is a real-life learned thing.
With TBAY it's different. In order to be able to just understand some
TBAY posts (let alone participe), I not only have to acquire a great
load of specific background, but I also have to develop (if that's
possible) a very specific mindset. And that's unfair to me.
Or am I a below-average listee ?
Del
More information about the HPFGU-Feedback
archive