Language (was : TBAY - my take)
Doriane
delwynmarch at delwynmarch.yahoo.invalid
Tue Dec 16 09:39:08 UTC 2003
"naamagatus" wrote:
> If it's so impossible for you to understand TBAY posts, how do you
> know "they make very interesting theories and points"?
Because other people respond and comment on the TBAY posts in a
straight way :-) And I understand *those* posts. And from the
comments, I figure out what the theory must be about, and I get
interested. But I can't get all the details that way.
And before you tell me so, yes I am a glutton for punishment too :-)
If I know that the post I'm reading refers back to a TBAY post, I
should leave it. I know. But I *can't* :-) !
> Conversely, HPfGU does not have an official format in which to
> write posts. Therefore, I don't see that you have the right to
> demand that people stop using a format that they enjoy and find
> meaningful.
And that's precisely the problem, isn't it ? Should we decide on a
unique, understandable-by-all format, or should we allow alternate
formats even though they leave some listees out ?
I'm adressing that issue on my post "TBAY : an open door to
diversity".
> I suppose that the general atmosphere in the list is getting to me.
> I want people to just ... stop, you know? Be nice to each other
> (...) and not *look* for things to complain about. How about a
> little live and let live approach?
I know, I want the same things. But before you can decide to let
something live, you have to make sure it's not harmful to you. And I
guess that's what we're trying to decide here.
Del
More information about the HPFGU-Feedback
archive