top-posting & tennis
cubfanbudwoman
susiequsie23 at cubfanbudwoman.yahoo.invalid
Wed Feb 9 14:53:20 UTC 2005
Tammy Rizzo:
> One question, though, if that's all right? What is 'top-posting'?
> I can't seem to find that term defined anywhere. Maybe I'm not
> looking in the right places, but I can't find it. Thanks!
SSS:
Top-posting is when someone sends a response and puts his/her own
comments *above* the post to which he/she is responding. Whereas the
expectation is that the responder will snip the relevant portion of
the original post, then put his/her own comments BELOW.
More on tennis debates or tennis exchanges. I still think we need to
be careful when we weigh in on this that we're not mixing up real
debate between two people and what I suspect was meant by tennis
exchanges: back & forth, NON-substantive comments between two
people.
"Yes, it IS abuse."
"No, it's NOT abuse."
"Well, as I've said 300 times before, it's abuse because ...."
"Well, as I'VE said 400 times before, it's not abuse because...."
"Well, you're just WRONG."
This is the kind of thing I'm talking about. Once you've made your
point, if another poster doesn't agree, reply back if you can expand
or amend your argument. If it turns out it's simply a matter of
differing opinions, there comes a point when it's fruitless to
continue.
I've heard many, many complaints about this kind of onlist
bantering. I'm sure some people like it, but I'm guessing it's one
of the most oft-mentioned complaints to the admin team?? Any elves
care to comment on that?
Siriusly Snapey Susan
More information about the HPFGU-Feedback
archive