Observations re limits, readability, search-ability, etc

[dumbledore11214]

--- In HPFGU-Feedback at yahoogroups.com, "potioncat" <willsonkmom at ...> 
wrote:
>
>  
> > Alla:
>  
> > But still, what about the books about HP? Do we want to discuss 
> them?
> >
> 
> Potioncat:
> Such book discussions have happened in the past---before my time. 
It 
> seems that one of them was being revived, but I'm not sure what 
came 
> of it. Are there any current books-about-Harry-Potter?
> 
> For that matter, would it be of any interest to go over Quidditch 
> through the Ages or Fantastic Beasts? (Remember Dumbledore's 
forward 
> and the theories that one generated?)
> 
> My original thought was that discussions about resources would 
help 
> all of us. Sometimes they generate their own thread. I remember 
once 
> quoting the Lexicon, and having that start a thread about whether 
the 
> Lexicon had it right.
> 
> I was looking for the essay section the other day---I couldn't 
> remember if it was at HPfGU or at the Lexicon---but I never did 
find 
> it. (Alla, where do you find the Elkins posts? I'm looking for 
> Porphyria's "Snape as the Satan.") But I'm sure lots of list 
members 
> have no idea those articles are out there. 
> 
> What is the general feeling? Would discussions about other books 
or 
> resources be considered OT, or would they be appropriate for the 
main 
> list?
>

Others already mentioned Essay sections, but also a lot of great 
posts are in recommended posts databases ( including all Elkins 
famous posts)

Alla