Observations re limits, readability, search-ability, etc

[a_silmariel]

--- In HPFGU-Feedback at yahoogroups.com, "potioncat" <willsonkmom at ...>
wrote:
> For that matter, would it be of any interest to go over Quidditch 
> through the Ages or Fantastic Beasts? (Remember Dumbledore's forward 
> and the theories that one generated?)
> 

I'd love to. Fantastic Beasts has some details worth discussing,
included the forward, and I'd like to see what others think about QTTA.

> My original thought was that discussions about resources would help 
> all of us. Sometimes they generate their own thread. I remember once 
> quoting the Lexicon, and having that start a thread about whether the 
> Lexicon had it right.

Yep, I think discussing resources would be a nice way for newbies to
grasp those fantastic posts and essays that can be found out there.

> What is the general feeling? Would discussions about other books or 
> resources be considered OT, or would they be appropriate for the main 
> list?

Books on HP have been discussed in the main list, if my memory doesn't
fail. I skip those discussions because I'm not interested, but I
didn't knew they could be considered OT.

Elkins vault:

http://www.theennead.com/elkins/hp/posts.html

Silmariel