HP DVDs in wide screen vs full screen
huntergreen_3
patientx3 at aol.com
Thu Dec 2 11:13:44 UTC 2004
--- In HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com, GulPlum <hp at p...> wrote:
>>Is the US population *so* technically and visually uneducated that
they'd actually be willing to watch this crap? PoA is bad enough, but
Spider-Man 2 isn't a matter or individual sequences being ruined -
the whole movie from start to end would be unwatchable.<<
Yes they are. Not the majority by any means (widescreen versions
always sell better then fullscreen), but there are many, MANY, people
who have never noticed that a movie-theater screen is a different
shape than their television screen (I have explained widescreen vs.
fullscreen to SO many people; its not anything *new*). Personally I
don't think that fullscreen DVDs should be produced at all. It just
seems wrong to me.
On the other hand though, not everyone is a movie buff. I work at a
video store and over the last few years I've seen the switch from VHS
to DVD, and its unfortunate that a lot of people are being forced to
upgrade to DVD (VHS is getting harder and harder to get a hold of)
when they don't understand the technology, nor do they really want
to. Suddenly the screen is different and they don't understand why
(I've even talked to people who think the top and bottom of the movie
were cut out).
In any case, widescreen is SO much better, please no one buy a
fullscreen Harry Potter or any other movie, its not hard to get used
to, and has a more "cinematic" feel. I have a small TV and that
doesn't make a difference, I can see it fine. Once you get used to
it, you'll never want to go back.
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive