Movies making Harry seem weak?

geebsy geebsy at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 21 02:45:58 UTC 2006


--- In HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com, "Andrea Grevera" <agdisney at m...> 
wrote:
>
> 
> 
>   
>   Personally, and I know that I'm in the minority, but I
>   liked the first 2 movies better then 3 and somewhat 4.
>   The first 2 stuck to the books with minor changes.
>   Book 3 put scenes wherever the director felt like it and
>   4 was too rushed.  but that is MHO.
> 
>   I hope OOTP keeps to the story and doesn't leave out
>   the departure of the twins.
> 

geebsy replies:
The first two films were thought to be too slavish to the books by 
many movie reviewers.  The third was supposed to have caputured 
the "real magic" of the HP world.  GoF is generally believed to be 
lacking in a real emotional punch.  
However...from what I understand most HP fans liked the first two 
movies for keeping generally to the books, dislike the story re-
arrangement in PoA and its "artsyness'. Goblet is  too new to come 
to deffinate conclusions, although most fans find in favor of it, 
despite the severe cutting the book had to go through. Rushed is the 
correct word for it.   This is just a quicksummary of what I have 
found in reading most HP sites.

Roxane 
  



> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>








More information about the HPFGU-Movie archive