[HPFGU-Movie] Re: Cuts and Bruises

[Richard]

At 19:20 30/01/2006 , starjackson1 wrote:
>If women here were sexualizing an 11-year-old (or 8 year old, or six
>year old, etc.) boy, it would be pediphilia. However, comments like
>these about Dan did not surface unitl he passed puberty and became a
>man - even if he is not legal age yet.  So,there is nothing wrong
>with these comments.  If you don't like them, you can always leave
>the list or not read posts related to this topic.

For the last few days, I've been trying the latter, but it's not easy when 
it appears it's pretty much all the listies want to talk about. So I'm 
taking your advice and doing the former. I am not a prude but the tenor of 
*some* of the comments in this thread have made be feel distinctly uneasy.

Incidentally, what p*sses me off even more than the sight of a bunch of 
middle-aged women drooling (yes, that's the word) over a 16 year-old is the 
completely unsurprising fact that this topic is the first time I've seen a 
single word from several of these people. If all you want from this list is 
to exchange superlatives about how "hot" you find the boy, then you're 
welcome to it. I'm off.

Oh, and while I'm ranting, I would remind people that there are three 
fairly basic formatting conventions on this list (and not only here). 
Trimming posts, no top-posting, and no one-liners. And lo and behold, we 
get several posts which are all there. And even a few posts which were 
added nothing but a single word.

"Jeez".

Bye bye, folks. It has been fun in the past, but I wish I could say the 
same for the last few days.

I'm off to seek new pastures, at least for the time being (probably when 
OotP comes out).

Don't bother responding, anyone, neither here nor by email.