Harry Potter Ending

[kempermentor]

> > Kemper earlier:
> > How would their death progress the story more than the deaths that
> > occur?

> Steve:
> .... With all that Harry has had to endure from SS on foward, the
story would be relevent as I have stated if one is to remain true to
the theme. Voldemort and his Death Eaters would make it a point to go
after Harry's friends.

Kemper now:
I guess I would like to know what you identify as the theme.  I did a
quick search with 'theme' in the search engine of the this group and
did not find anything.  Which isn't to say that you haven't mentioned
it, just that you hadn't used 'theme' in the sentence.  If I were to
infer what you mean to be the theme, I would say it was Death.

If so, I think the audience would be beaten over the brow with it. 
The first movie starts out just after the deaths of Harry's parents,
but then nothing until GF (Frank Bryce, the caretaker of the house at
the start of the movie, and Cedric).  OP saw Sirius die.  HBP will
give us Dumbledore's death.  DH will give even more deaths, with Fred,
Lupin, and Snape probably being most significant for the movie
watcher.  But if Ron or Hermione were to die, the audience would roll
their eyes at being spoon fed the that theme.

Kemper

Kemper