slash fiction - responses
Tim Regan <timregan@microsoft.com>
timregan at microsoft.com
Tue Jan 7 17:48:03 UTC 2003
Hi All,
-- dianasdolls wrote:
> I was referring specifically to the Lucius/Draco incestuous
pairing
> Cassie mentioned at the very beginning of post. Even if that
fanfic
> piece was written by the greatest writer of all time, I would not
> find an incestuous relationship between a father and son, even
> between two characters I dislike [almost love to hate], in the
> slightest bit appealing.
I do relate to this point, even though I haven't yet found the time
to check out fan-fiction. There are two works, considered great,
that I just cannot stand because of their subject matter. One is
Nabokov's "Lolita", which I had to stop reading half way through
since it was annoying me so much. The other's Nirvana's "Polly"
which spoilt the whole album for me. I guess in each case I want the
author to take a moral stand on the horrific acts they are
describing. I can see three reasons for not doing so:
1) The authors don't find the acts horrific, which if the consumer
does is a good reason to stop reading or listening.
2) The author wants to challenge the consumers' values. This might
work but seems condescending on the authors' part.
3) The authors want to shock. But that doesn't seem reason enough.
Shock is a good tactic against something which has grown stagnant
(e.g. punk in the seventies) but I don't think that covers "Lolita"
or "Polly".
Cheers,
Dumbledad
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive