Hagridddd's education rant ( Re: Reading, Writing, and Multiple Choice)
Haggridd
jkusalavagemd at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 7 06:49:54 UTC 2003
--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, "Catlady (Rita Prince
Winston)" <catlady at w...> wrote:
> --- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, "Haggridd"
> <jkusalavagemd at y...> wrote:
> >
> > there are numerous reports that the per student cost is far
higher
> > in the public system. In my dictionary, it says that that is the
> > precise definiton of "inefficient"; its denotation, if you will.
>
> I have seen some of those reports analysed to reveal that the MODE
> average cost per student in the specific public system was lower
than
> in the comparison private schools, but the MEAN average cost per
> student in the specific public system was higher because it
included
> the fantastically high costs of particular disabled students ...
You have a valid point, and a rather good one. I would like to see
such a calculation made for successful public school systems to
compare them to failed systems and in turn to better private scools
vs. poorer private schools.
But would any kind of modal average not reflect that best case
scenario of only the pupils who require the least resources, and
therefor exclude all those disabled student costs perforce?
Haggridd (double "g", double "d")
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive