"Foreign" students at Hogwarts (Cho)
L
prittylina at yahoo.com
Sat May 24 23:52:21 UTC 2003
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Petra Pan <ms_petra_pan at y...>
wrote:
> DrMM, in part:
> > Cho Chang is most definatly not
> > a Japanese name. The Japanese
> > language doesn't have a hard "g"
> > sound.
>
> Does 'Chang' have a hard 'g' sound
> in it? <eg>
No, it doesn't; "Chang" is, phonetically // (or
/a/), although
I believe that, in this case (as "cho" is not a pinyin Chinese
morpheme ["chou", yes]), it is actually Zhang (Wades-Giles system),
thus /a/. (At least, this is how the Chinese version
translates it
[QiuZhang == Cho Chang, HaliBote == Harry Potter], with
which I
much agree.) To me, her name brings to mind either someone from
Taiwan or someone who is British-born (second generation, likely),
given the fact that the name seems to be Wade-Giles. Perhaps HK, but
Cantonese really doesn't have "Chang" as a surname (Cantonese would
be "Cheung")...
However, it could be noted that "Chang" could be a Korean name under
certain romanizations. (If I recall correctly, "Jang" [the equilivent
of "Zhang/Chang"] has been romanized as "Chang" in the past.)
Doubtful, though, that it's such.
> Though I agree that naming a
> character 'Cho Chang' is not
> likely meant to indicate Japanese
> ancestry, the reason you give
> above is completely not in keeping
> with what we know of the Japanese
> language. I mean, what are the 'g'
> sounds in, say, 'origami' and
> 'arigato' if they aren't hard?
> Take a look at the next to last
> paragraph of this page:
I think that they meant that a hard 'g' does not exist in a final
sound. However, that 'g' is not indicating a consonant, but a
particular nasal ().
> > I've also met a *lot* of Japanese
> > people and I have yet to meet one
> > named Cho or Chang (I live in
> > Japan right now).
>
> Living in California, I've also
> encountered a great many names that
> are of Japanese origin. I have yet
> to see a family name that is mono-
> syllabic. Hardly conclusive but
> there you have it - another reason
> this name does not read 'Japanese'
> to me.
Most certainly not. Japanese is a syballic language, with only one
final nasal-syllable (/n/), and the rest of syllables as CV
(consonant vowel). It's a beautifully phonetic language like that. :D
L, who is a fan of East Asian linguistics
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive