[HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: Putting in my 2p again

Kathryn kcawte at ntlworld.com
Wed Apr 6 17:22:09 UTC 2005


 Joe

As an American, I only have a passing familiarity with the Monarchy,
but if I'm not mistaken, in Camilla's youth, she would have been a
most *INAPPROPRIATE* candidate for Charles.  As a Catholic, I don't
think Camilla would have stood a chance of marrying Charles 30 years
ago.  Aside from Camilla being a divorcee, the continued love and
respect of the people for Dianna, Camilla's Catholicism is still a
major sticker.
 
I believe it was a mariage that could not have taken place 30 years
ago.
 
K

She must have changed her religion because if she was Catholic Charles would
have to remove himself from the Line of Succession and he hasn't. It is
illegalone
 No, seriously! I was under the impression she was Catholic too btw, I
thought that was why Charles went off without getting engaged to her, but
obviously not. I think *Andrew* Parker-Bowles is Catholic though so maybe
that's where the confusion comes in.

That's why Prince Michael of Kent had to sign away his rights to the throne,
of course there would have to be a major catastrophe for him to get to the
top of the list anyway, but that's beside the point. 
 
K
 
 
 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter archive